| Title |
Retraction Note to: Surface-functionalized gold nanoparticles mediate bacterial transformation: a nanobiotechnological approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biotechnology Techniques, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10529-015-1826-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Saptarshi Chatterjee, Keka Sarkar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Linguistics | 1 | 25% |
| Design | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2015.
All research outputs
#6,737,197
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology Techniques
#727
of 2,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,585
of 279,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology Techniques
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.