↓ Skip to main content

Association Between the Use of Oral Contraceptives and Patient‐Reported Outcomes in an Early Arthritis Cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Care & Research, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association Between the Use of Oral Contraceptives and Patient‐Reported Outcomes in an Early Arthritis Cohort
Published in
Arthritis Care & Research, February 2016
DOI 10.1002/acr.22667
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katinka Albrecht, Johanna Callhoff, Frank Buttgereit, Rainer H Straub, Gisela Westhoff, Angela Zink

Abstract

To evaluate the association between exposure to oral contraceptives (OC) and clinical outcomes in an early arthritis cohort. Female patients with early inflammatory arthritis, aged 18 to 60, who were enrolled in an early arthritis cohort and had no exposure to hormone replacement were studied (n=273). Associations between OC exposure (current/past/never) and disease activity, treatment and patient-reported outcomes, including the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease Score (RAID), the Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI), the Profile of Mood and Discomfort (PROFAD) and the Hannover Functional Assessment (FFbH), were studied over 2 years. Linear mixed models adjusted for age, BMI, parity, smoking and education were used. Eighteen percent of patients had never used OCs, 63% had used OCs in the past, and 19% currently used OCs. After adjustment, the current/past OC use was associated with better RAID, PROFAD, RADAI and FFbH scores at 12 months (all p<0.05) compared to never use. Longitudinally over two years, the mean RAID scores were significantly better in women with current/past OC use (p<0.001). Actual inflammatory markers were not associated with OC use. Glucocorticoids were used by a higher percentage of OC never users than by current/past users (p=0.08), especially in patients with impaired function (FFbH<70: OR 4.2 [1.6, 11]). For past as well as current use, OCs seem to moderate patient-reported outcomes in inflammatory arthritis. Protective effects may be induced via central nervous pathways rather than through the suppression of peripheral inflammation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 26%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 18%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2016.
All research outputs
#823,690
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Care & Research
#200
of 2,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,400
of 304,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Care & Research
#3
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.