↓ Skip to main content

Why Negative Feelings are Important when Assessing Well-Being

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Happiness Studies, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Why Negative Feelings are Important when Assessing Well-Being
Published in
Journal of Happiness Studies, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10902-015-9667-z
Authors

Bjørn Grinde

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 32%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 8%
Arts and Humanities 3 6%
Philosophy 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 16 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2015.
All research outputs
#17,768,879
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Happiness Studies
#776
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,640
of 263,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Happiness Studies
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.