You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does Faux Pas Detection in Adult Autism Reflect Differences in Social Cognition or Decision-Making Abilities?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-015-2551-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Flora I. Thiébaut, Sarah J. White, Annabel Walsh, Solja K. Klargaard, Hsuan-Chen Wu, Geraint Rees, Paul W. Burgess |
| Abstract |
43 typically-developed adults and 35 adults with ASD performed a cartoon faux pas test. Adults with ASD apparently over-detected faux pas despite good comprehension abilities, and were generally slower at responding. Signal detection analysis demonstrated that the ASD participants had significantly greater difficulty detecting whether a cartoon depicted a faux pas and showed a liberal response bias. Test item analysis demonstrated that the ASD group were not in agreement with a reference control group (n = 69) about which non-faux pas items were most difficult. These results suggest that the participants with ASD had a primary problem with faux pas detection, but that there is another factor at work, possibly compensatory, that relates to their choice of a liberal response criterion. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 36 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 61 | 43% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 41 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#8,059,753
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,735
of 5,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,293
of 277,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#48
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.