↓ Skip to main content

Insulin resistance is associated with poorer verbal fluency performance in women

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Insulin resistance is associated with poorer verbal fluency performance in women
Published in
Diabetologia, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00125-015-3715-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura L. Ekblad, Juha O. Rinne, Pauli J. Puukka, Hanna K. Laine, Satu E. Ahtiluoto, Raimo O. Sulkava, Matti H. Viitanen, Antti M. Jula

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes is an independent risk factor for cognitive decline. Insulin resistance occurring during midlife may increase the risk of cognitive decline later in life. We hypothesised that insulin resistance is associated with poorer cognitive performance and that sex and APOE*E4 might modulate this association. The association of insulin resistance and APOE*E4 genotype on cognitive function was evaluated in a nationwide Finnish population-based study (n = 5,935, mean age 52.5 years, range 30-97 years). HOMA-IR was used to measure insulin resistance. Cognitive function was tested by word-list learning, word-list delayed-recall, categorical verbal fluency and simple and visual-choice reaction-time tests. Linear regression analysis was used to determine the association between HOMA-IR and the results of the cognitive tests. Higher HOMA-IR was associated with poorer verbal fluency in women (p < 0.0001) but not in men (p = 0.56). Higher HOMA-IR was also associated with poorer verbal fluency in APOE*E4 -negative individuals (p = 0.0003), but not in APOE*E4 carriers (p = 0.28). Furthermore, higher HOMA-IR was associated with a slower simple reaction time in the whole study group (p = 0.02). To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive, population-based study, including both young and middle-aged adults, to report that female sex impacts the association of HOMA-IR with verbal fluency. Our study was cross-sectional, so causal effects of HOMA-IR on cognition could not be evaluated. However, our results suggest that HOMA-IR could be an early marker for an increased risk of cognitive decline in women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
India 1 1%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 21%
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Professor 4 6%
Other 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 23%
Neuroscience 10 14%
Psychology 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Linguistics 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 24 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2015.
All research outputs
#1,086,159
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#606
of 5,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,116
of 264,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#12
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.