↓ Skip to main content

The Pace of Shifting Climate in Marine and Terrestrial Ecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in Science, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1031 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1845 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Pace of Shifting Climate in Marine and Terrestrial Ecosystems
Published in
Science, November 2011
DOI 10.1126/science.1210288
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael T. Burrows, David S. Schoeman, Lauren B. Buckley, Pippa Moore, Elvira S. Poloczanska, Keith M. Brander, Chris Brown, John F. Bruno, Carlos M. Duarte, Benjamin S. Halpern, Johnna Holding, Carrie V. Kappel, Wolfgang Kiessling, Mary I. O’Connor, John M. Pandolfi, Camille Parmesan, Franklin B. Schwing, William J. Sydeman, Anthony J. Richardson

Abstract

Climate change challenges organisms to adapt or move to track changes in environments in space and time. We used two measures of thermal shifts from analyses of global temperatures over the past 50 years to describe the pace of climate change that species should track: the velocity of climate change (geographic shifts of isotherms over time) and the shift in seasonal timing of temperatures. Both measures are higher in the ocean than on land at some latitudes, despite slower ocean warming. These indices give a complex mosaic of predicted range shifts and phenology changes that deviate from simple poleward migration and earlier springs or later falls. They also emphasize potential conservation concerns, because areas of high marine biodiversity often have greater velocities of climate change and seasonal shifts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,845 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 38 2%
United Kingdom 12 <1%
Canada 12 <1%
Brazil 11 <1%
Germany 8 <1%
Spain 8 <1%
South Africa 6 <1%
Italy 6 <1%
Australia 6 <1%
Other 36 2%
Unknown 1702 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 421 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 390 21%
Student > Master 258 14%
Student > Bachelor 151 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 77 4%
Other 297 16%
Unknown 251 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 719 39%
Environmental Science 462 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 175 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 2%
Social Sciences 17 <1%
Other 99 5%
Unknown 334 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 210. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2023.
All research outputs
#188,817
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Science
#5,508
of 83,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#635
of 155,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#19
of 689 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 689 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.