| Title |
Fluorescent pteridine nucleoside analogs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, January 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1385/cbb:34:2:257 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary E. Hawkins |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Professor | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 19 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2010.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics
#159
of 1,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,247
of 114,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,017 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.