↓ Skip to main content

Moving between language frontiers: the challenges of the medium of instruction policy for Chinese as a second language

Overview of attention for article published in Language Policy, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Moving between language frontiers: the challenges of the medium of instruction policy for Chinese as a second language
Published in
Language Policy, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10993-018-9465-7
Authors

Elizabeth K. Y. Loh, Loretta C. W. Tam, Kwok-chang Lau

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 5 12%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 17 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 7 17%
Arts and Humanities 6 15%
Social Sciences 6 15%
Unspecified 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 17 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2019.
All research outputs
#17,980,413
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from Language Policy
#222
of 272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,200
of 329,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Language Policy
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 272 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.