↓ Skip to main content

Routine Cardiac Catheterization Prior to Fontan Operation: Is It a Necessity?

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Cardiology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Routine Cardiac Catheterization Prior to Fontan Operation: Is It a Necessity?
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00246-018-1825-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bassel Mohammad Nijres, Joshua J. Murphy, Karim Diab, Sawsan Awad, Ra-id Abdulla

Abstract

Prior to the Fontan procedure, patients with single ventricle physiology with Glenn shunt are typically referred for cardiac catheterization to assess hemodynamics and potentially provide interventional measures. Currently, echocardiography provides detailed information which together with other non-invasive imaging such as CT scan and MRI may obviate the need for routine cardiac catheterization prior to the Fontan procedure. In this study, we examine the findings in cardiac catheterization in this population to determine: (a) the accuracy of echocardiography in providing adequate information prior to the Fontan procedure, particularly in identifying those in need of per-catheter intervention, and (b) the percentage of patients requiring interventional procedures during cardiac catheterization. We performed a retrospective chart review of echocardiographic and cardiac catheterization data for patients who underwent pre-Fontan cardiac catheterization at our center in the period from 02/01/2008 to 02/28/2017. We aimed to re-examine the necessity of routine cardiac catheterization in all single ventricle patients. This was performed through examining pre-catheterization echocardiography reports and comparing them to findings of the subsequent cardiac catheterization reports. Echocardiography reports were evaluated for accuracy in identifying significant anatomical or hemodynamic findings, which may impact success of Fontan procedure as well as the ability of echocardiography to predict findings important to know prior to the Fontan procedure. In this cohort of 40 children, 3 patients were found to have significant hemodynamic findings through cardiac catheterization which were not previously known by echocardiography. In addition, 28 out of 40 patients (70%) required interventional procedures to address significant abnormalities (systemic to pulmonary arterial collaterals, pulmonary artery stenosis, aortic arch stenosis, etc.). All cases of aortic arch stenosis were detected by echocardiography, however, all patients who required systemic to pulmonary arterial or left SVC embolization were not detected by echocardiography. Furthermore, echocardiography did not detect the need for branch pulmonary artery stenosis in 50% of cases. Cardiac catheterization appears to be an essential part of patient assessment prior to Fontan completion in patients with single ventricle physiology. This current practice may change in the future if a non-invasive screening tool is found to have high positive and negative predictive values in identifying the subset of patients who require potential intervention in pre-Fontan cardiac catheterization.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Other 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,538,060
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Cardiology
#663
of 1,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,105
of 438,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Cardiology
#12
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,418 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.