↓ Skip to main content

Characterizing the Relative Importance Assigned to Physical Variables by Climate Scientists when Assessing Atmospheric Climate Model Fidelity

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
11 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Characterizing the Relative Importance Assigned to Physical Variables by Climate Scientists when Assessing Atmospheric Climate Model Fidelity
Published in
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00376-018-7300-x
Authors

Susannah M. Burrows, Aritra Dasgupta, Sarah Reehl, Lisa Bramer, Po-Lun Ma, Philip J. Rasch, Yun Qian

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 30%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 35%
Environmental Science 3 13%
Chemistry 2 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 5 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,191,616
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Atmospheric Sciences
#176
of 875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,554
of 327,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Atmospheric Sciences
#7
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.