↓ Skip to main content

Comparing domestic versus imported apples: A focus on energy use

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
Title
Comparing domestic versus imported apples: A focus on energy use
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, April 2007
DOI 10.1065/espr2007.04.412
Pubmed ID
Authors

Llorenç Milà i Canals, Sarah J. Cowell, Sarah Sim, Lauren Basson

Abstract

The issue of whether food miles are a relevant indicator for the environmental impacts associated with foods has received significant attention in recent years. It is suggested here that issues other than the distance travelled need to be considered. The argument is presented by illustrating the case for the provision of apples. The effects of variability in primary energy requirements for apple cultivation and for other life cycle stages, seasonality (timing of consumption) and loss of produce during storage are studied in this paper, by comparing apples from different supplier countries for consumption in Europe. Data sources for primary energy use (PEU) of apple production are identified ranging from 0.4-3.8 MJ/kg apples for European and Southern American countries and 0.4-0.7 MJ/kg for New Zealand. This variability is related to different yields and producer management practices in the different countries. Storage loss may range from 5% to 40% for storage periods between 4 and 10 months, and this has a significant effect on the results (e.g. increasing the total PEU by 8-16% when stored for 5-9 months in Europe as compared with a no loss and no storage situation). The storage periods and related storage losses change markedly through the year for imported (i.e. non-European) versus European apples. The timing of consumption and related storage losses need to be included in the assessment, as this affects the order of preference for locally sourced versus imported apples. The variability in energy requirements in different life cycle stages, but particularly for the fruit production stage, is also significant in this comparative analysis. Overall, it seems that there are similarities in the total PEU ranges for European and New Zealand apples during the Southern Hemisphere's apple season (European spring and summer). However, during the European autumn and winter (Northern Hemisphere apple season) PEU values are generally higher for apples imported from the Southern Hemisphere compared with European apples consumed in Europe. However, this latter observation may not hold true where apples for consumption in one European country are imported from another European country, because energy use for road transportation has a significant influence on the result. Future studies comparing alternative sources of fresh produce need to account for ranges of data for the fruit production and storage stages, which reflect the seasonality of production.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 163 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 21%
Student > Master 34 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Other 9 5%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 28 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 46 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 7%
Engineering 11 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 5%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 44 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,070,186
of 24,585,562 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#1,479
of 10,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,128
of 75,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,585,562 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.