↓ Skip to main content

A challenging case of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae septic thrombophlebitis and right mural endocarditis successfully treated with ceftazidime/avibactam

Overview of attention for article published in Infection, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
A challenging case of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae septic thrombophlebitis and right mural endocarditis successfully treated with ceftazidime/avibactam
Published in
Infection, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s15010-018-1166-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandra Iacovelli, Martina Spaziante, Samir Al Moghazi, Alessandra Giordano, Giancarlo Ceccarelli, Mario Venditti

Abstract

The emergence of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumonia (KPC-Kp) has become a significant problem in terms of public health and clinical outcome in many hospitals in Southern Europe. Treatment options are usually limited and effective treatment of infections caused by these pathogens is a considerable challenge for clinicians. Ceftazidime-avibactam has been recently approved for the treatment of difficult-to-treat infections due to aerobic Gram-negative organisms in patients with limited treatment options. We reported the first case of KPC-Kp septic thrombophlebitis and right atrial endocarditis associated with metastatic lung abscesses successfully treated with a prolonged ceftazidime/avibactam plus ertapenem treatment course, suggesting that this combination therapy could be safe and effective for serious Gram-negative infections. Interestingly, we also observed an apparent discrepancy between clinical and microbiological courses: the patient became rapidly afebrile; hemodynamically stable and his procalcitonin levels showed a prompt decreasing trend. Nevertheless, blood cultures remained persistently positive for a prolonged period. In conclusion, ceftazidime-avibactam plus ertapenem was a safe and effective therapy of serious endovascular infection due to KPC-Kp. Moreover, in this setting, follow-up blood cultures might represent an irreplaceable tool to guide the therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 18%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2018.
All research outputs
#20,523,725
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from Infection
#1,255
of 1,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,398
of 328,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection
#15
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.