↓ Skip to main content

A Robust Reduced Rank Graph Regression Method for Neuroimaging Genetic Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroinformatics, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
A Robust Reduced Rank Graph Regression Method for Neuroimaging Genetic Analysis
Published in
Neuroinformatics, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12021-018-9382-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaofeng Zhu, Weihong Zhang, Yong Fan, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract

To characterize associations between genetic and neuroimaging data, a variety of analytic methods have been proposed in neuroimaging genetic studies. These methods have achieved promising performance by taking into account inherent correlation in either the neuroimaging data or the genetic data alone. In this study, we propose a novel robust reduced rank graph regression based method in a linear regression framework by considering correlations inherent in neuroimaging data and genetic data jointly. Particularly, we model the association analysis problem in a reduced rank regression framework with the genetic data as a feature matrix and the neuroimaging data as a response matrix by jointly considering correlations among the neuroimaging data as well as correlations between the genetic data and the neuroimaging data. A new graph representation of genetic data is adopted to exploit their inherent correlations, in addition to robust loss functions for both the regression and the data representation tasks, and a square-root-operator applied to the robust loss functions for achieving adaptive sample weighting. The resulting optimization problem is solved using an iterative optimization method whose convergence has been theoretically proved. Experimental results on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset have demonstrated that our method could achieve competitive performance in terms of regression performance between brain structural measures and the Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs), compared with state-of-the-art alternative methods.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Psychology 2 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2018.
All research outputs
#4,241,203
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from Neuroinformatics
#69
of 407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,576
of 328,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroinformatics
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 407 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.