| Title |
Foliar water uptake: a common water acquisition strategy for plants of the redwood forest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-009-1400-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily Burns Limm, Kevin A. Simonin, Aron G. Bothman, Todd E. Dawson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 381 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 361 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 86 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 17% |
| Researcher | 61 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 62 | 16% |
| Unknown | 43 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 180 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 91 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 24 | 6% |
| Engineering | 11 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 3% |
| Unknown | 55 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2016.
All research outputs
#15,563,090
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3,591
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,072
of 125,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#14
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.