| Title |
A history of the study of solid tumour growth: The contribution of mathematical modelling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, September 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.bulm.2003.11.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. P. Araujo, D. L. S. McElwain |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 345 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 320 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 105 | 30% |
| Researcher | 64 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 22 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 62 | 18% |
| Unknown | 35 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 69 | 20% |
| Mathematics | 58 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 15% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 32 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 27 | 8% |
| Other | 56 | 16% |
| Unknown | 52 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,099,635
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#77
of 1,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,396
of 69,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them