↓ Skip to main content

乾癬における生物学的製剤の使用指針および安全対策マニュアル(2011年版)

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
乾癬における生物学的製剤の使用指針および安全対策マニュアル(2011年版)
Published in
Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology, July 2011
DOI 10.14924/dermatol.121.1561
Authors

大槻 マミ太郎, 照井 正, 小澤 明, 森田 明理, 佐野 栄紀, 髙橋 英俊, 小宮根 真弓, 江藤 隆史, 鳥居 秀嗣, 朝比奈 昭彦, 根本 治, 中川 秀己

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2018.
All research outputs
#8,533,110
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology
#86
of 254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,474
of 127,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.