↓ Skip to main content

Watching a real moving object expands tactile duration: The role of task-irrelevant action context for subjective time

Overview of attention for article published in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Watching a real moving object expands tactile duration: The role of task-irrelevant action context for subjective time
Published in
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, August 2015
DOI 10.3758/s13414-015-0975-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lina Jia, Zhuanghua Shi, Xuelian Zang, Hermann J. Müller

Abstract

Although it is well established that action contexts can expand the perceived durations of action-related events, whether action contexts also impact the subjective duration of events unrelated to the action remains an open issue. Here we examined how the automatic implicit reactions induced by viewing task-irrelevant, real moving objects influence tactile duration judgments. Participants were asked to make temporal bisection judgments of a tactile event while seeing a potentially catchable swinging ball. Approaching movement induced a tactile-duration overestimation relative to lateral movement and to a static baseline, and receding movement produced an expansion similar in duration to that from approaching movement. Interestingly, the effect of approaching movement on the subjective tactile duration was greatly reduced when participants held lightweight objects in their hands, relative to a hands-free condition, whereas no difference was obtained in the tactile-duration estimates between static hands-free and static hands-occupied conditions. The results indicate that duration perception is determined by internal bodily states as well as by sensory evidence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 22%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 49%
Neuroscience 4 10%
Engineering 3 7%
Computer Science 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2016.
All research outputs
#14,820,201
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#670
of 1,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,855
of 266,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#15
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.