↓ Skip to main content

Distinct impacts of reductive soil disinfestation and chemical soil disinfestation on soil fungal communities and memberships

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Distinct impacts of reductive soil disinfestation and chemical soil disinfestation on soil fungal communities and memberships
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00253-018-9107-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jun Zhao, Xing Zhou, Anqi Jiang, Juanzi Fan, Tao Lan, Jinbo Zhang, Zucong Cai

Abstract

Soil disinfestation is an important agricultural practice to conquer soil-borne diseases and thereby ensure crop productivity. Reductive soil disinfestation (RSD) had been developed as an environmentally friendly alternative to chemical soil disinfestation (CSD). However, the differences between CSD and RSD on soil-borne pathogen suppression and fungal community structure remain poorly understood. In this work, five treatments, i.e., untreated soil (CK), CSD with 0.5 t ha-1 dazomet (DZ), RSD with 10 t ha-1 ethanol (ET), 15 t ha-1 sugarcane bagasse (SB), and 15 t ha-1 bean dregs (BD), were performed to investigate their influences on disinfestation efficiency, fungal abundance, diversity, and community structure via quantitative PCR and high-throughput sequencing. RSD-related treatments, especially the BD treatment, effectively alleviated soil acidification and salinization. The fungal abundance and microbial activity considerably increased in the BD treatment and significantly declined in the DZ treatment as compared to the CK treatment. Moreover, both CSD and RSD-related treatments significantly inhibited the population of Fusarium oxysporum and the relative abundance of genus Fusarium. Fungal community structure was notably altered by CSD and RSD practices. Furthermore, both CSD and RSD harbored a distinct unique microbiome, with the DZ treatment dominated by the genus Mortierella and BD treatment predominated by the genera Zopfiella, Chaetomium, and Penicillium. Taken together, these results indicate that the BD treatment could considerably alleviate the soil deterioration, improve soil microbial activity, and reassemble a non-pathogen unique microbiome that have more disease-suppressive agents and thus might be a promising disinfestation practice to control soil-borne disease in monoculture system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Researcher 5 17%
Other 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2019.
All research outputs
#4,311,338
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#1,014
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,637
of 332,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#23
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.