↓ Skip to main content

Orexin a phosphorylates the γ‐Aminobutyric acid type A receptor β2 subunit on a serine residue and changes the surface expression of the receptor in SH‐SY5Y cells exposed to propofol

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience Research, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Orexin a phosphorylates the γ‐Aminobutyric acid type A receptor β2 subunit on a serine residue and changes the surface expression of the receptor in SH‐SY5Y cells exposed to propofol
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience Research, August 2015
DOI 10.1002/jnr.23631
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henrik Andersson, Karin Björnström, Christina Eintrei, Tommy Sundqvist

Abstract

Propofol activates the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABAA R) and causes a reversible neurite retraction, leaving a thin, thread-like structure behind; it also reverses the transport of vesicles in rat cortical neurons. The awakening peptide orexin A (OA) inhibits this retraction via phospholipase D (PLD) and protein kinase Cɛ (PKCɛ). The human SH-SY5Y cells express both GABAA Rs and orexin 1 and 2 receptors. These cells are used to examine the interaction between OA and the GABAA R. The effects of OA are studied with flow cytometry and immunoblotting. This study shows that OA stimulates phosphorylation on the serine residues of the GABAA R β2 subunit and that the phosphorylation is caused by the activation of PLD and PKCɛ. OA administration followed by propofol reduces the cell surface expression of the GABAA R, whereas propofol stimulation before OA increases the surface expression. The GABAA R β2 subunit is important for receptor recirculation, and the effect of OA on propofol-stimulated cells may be due to a disturbed recirculation of the GABAA R. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 25%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 5 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2021.
All research outputs
#19,985,639
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience Research
#3,423
of 3,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,199
of 271,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience Research
#25
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.