↓ Skip to main content

A colorimetric assay of DNA methyltransferase activity based on peroxidase mimicking of DNA template Ag/Pt bimetallic nanoclusters

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
A colorimetric assay of DNA methyltransferase activity based on peroxidase mimicking of DNA template Ag/Pt bimetallic nanoclusters
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00216-018-1143-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanie Ahmadzade Kermani, Morteza Hosseini, Andrea Miti, Mehdi Dadmehr, Giampaolo Zuccheri, Saman Hosseinkhani, Mohammad Reza Ganjali

Abstract

DNA methylation catalyzed by DNA methyl transferase (MTase) is a significant epigenetic process for modulating gene expression. Abnormal levels of DNA MTase enzyme have been regarded as a cancer biomarker or a sign of bacterial diseases. We developed a novel colorimetric method to assay M.SssI MTase activity employing peroxidase-like activity of DNA template Ag/Pt NCs without using restriction enzymes. Based on inhibiting the peroxidase reaction that occurred in the TMB-H2O2 system, in the presence of MTase, a highly sensitive and selective colorimetric biosensor was fabricated with a detection limit (LOD) of 0.05 U/mL and a linear range from 0.5 to 10 U/mL. The changes in absorption intensity were monitored to quantify the M.SssI activity. This strategy had a high selectivity over other proteins. Furthermore, it is also demonstrated that this method can be used for the evaluation and screening of inhibitors for DNA MTase.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 16%
Environmental Science 2 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Materials Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#5,671
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,161
of 342,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#90
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.