↓ Skip to main content

Crime scene and body alterations caused by arthropods: implications in death investigation

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Legal Medicine, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Crime scene and body alterations caused by arthropods: implications in death investigation
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00414-018-1883-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Viero, M. Montisci, G. Pelletti, S. Vanin

Abstract

The activity of arthropods on corpses has been largely investigated, since they can produce information to reconstruct the peri-mortem events. However, the feeding/movement activity of insects around the crime scene, among the clothes and on the body, can also cause some alterations that can lead to wrong reconstruction and misinterpretations. This article summarises all the post-mortem arthropods artefacts related to the scene (i.e. fly artefacts and floor stripes) and the body (i.e. skin and other soft tissue alterations, bone alterations and hair alterations) that can mislead the forensic pathologist, discussing macroscopic and microscopic findings derived from forensic casework and from experimental laboratory studies, in order to provide a useful instrument to avoid misinterpretations and evaluation errors. Finally, some procedural notes for the documentation and the interpretation of findings are proposed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 27 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Chemistry 4 5%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 29 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,673,437
of 25,651,057 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#152
of 2,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,121
of 342,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#4
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,651,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,309 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.