↓ Skip to main content

Assembly of Active Bacterial and Fungal Communities Along a Natural Environmental Gradient

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Assembly of Active Bacterial and Fungal Communities Along a Natural Environmental Gradient
Published in
Microbial Ecology, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00248-015-0655-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca C Mueller, Laverne Gallegos-Graves, Donald R. Zak, Cheryl R Kuske

Abstract

Dormancy is thought to promote biodiversity within microbial communities, but how assembly of the active community responds to changes in environmental conditions is unclear. To measure the active and dormant communities of bacteria and fungi colonizing decomposing litter in maple forests, we targeted ribosomal genes and transcripts across a natural environmental gradient. Within bacterial and fungal communities, the active and dormant communities were phylogenetically distinct, but patterns of phylogenetic clustering varied. For bacteria, active communities were significantly more clustered than dormant communities, while the reverse was found for fungi. The proportion of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) classified as active and the degree of phylogenetic clustering of the active bacterial communities declined with increasing pH and decreasing C/N. No significant correlations were found for the fungal community. The opposing pattern of phylogenetic clustering in dormant and active communities and the differential response of active communities to environmental gradients suggest that dormancy differentially structures bacterial and fungal communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Unknown 61 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 41%
Environmental Science 13 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2015.
All research outputs
#14,081,827
of 24,546,092 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#1,194
of 2,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,435
of 271,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,546,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.