| Title |
Response to Hron et al.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-015-0725-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter V. Lovell, Morgan Wirthlin, Lucia Carbone, Wesley C. Warren, Claudio V. Mello |
| Abstract |
Hron et al. provide transcriptome evidence that three (1.1 %) of the 274 genes reported by Lovell et al. as missing in birds may actually be 'hidden' as a result of high GC content. Although this factor may explain some gene absences from genomic assemblies, we believe it is insufficient to account for the extensive syntenic losses described in Lovell et al. Please see related article: www.dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0724-z. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2015.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#4,394
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,894
of 277,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#82
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.