↓ Skip to main content

Clinical management for patients admitted to a critical care unit with severe sepsis or septic shock

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive & Critical Care Nursing, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical management for patients admitted to a critical care unit with severe sepsis or septic shock
Published in
Intensive & Critical Care Nursing, August 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.iccn.2015.04.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wai Keung Cheung, Lai Sheung Chau, Iun Ieng Laurinda Mak, Mei Yi Wong, Sai Leung Wong, Agnes Fung Yee Tiwari

Abstract

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign promotes the use of norepinephrine as the first-line inotropic support for patients presenting with severe sepsis or septic shock in cases of persistent hypotension, despite adequate fluid resuscitation. However, there is little published evidence on how much noradrenaline is administered to such patients when admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The authors report the clinical management of this group of patients, with a special focus on the total amount and duration of norepinephrine infusion required. A chart review of the admission records of an ICU in Hong Kong was carried out in 2013. A total of 5000 patients were screened by their diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock (in the admissions book) between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2013. A total of 150 of these were identified and 100 included in the study after simultaneous in-depth reviews of their case notes by two of the investigators. The analysis covers those with severe sepsis or septic shock who required ICU admission for further care. Clinical management and outcomes were analysed. 100 patients (median age 61.6; M/F ratio 2:1) met the inclusion criteria. The mean ICU stay was 13.4 days (range=1-371). 14 patients (14%) died in the ICU, with a 28-day mortality rate of 22%. The mean period of mechanical ventilation was 6.1 days (range=0-137). 91.5% (n=43) of patients had been operated on immediately before admission to the ICU, and the majority of these operations had been of the emergency type (97.7%, n=43). The mean total volumes of crystalloid and colloid administered were 3420ml and 478ml, respectively. The mean wean-off period for norepinephrine infusion was 4234minutes (70.5hours). All patients were prescribed norepinephrine for persistent hypotension despite adequate fluid resuscitation, and the mean total amount administered was 87,211mg. Final multiple linear and logistic regression analysis showed different clinical outcomes associated with different covariates, which included: (1) total amount of crystalloid given, positively associated with the total amount and duration of norepinephrine infusion; (2) duration of mechanical ventilation, positively associated with the type of operation the patient had undergone; (3) 28-day mortality rate, positively associated with the INR. What this study adds to knowledge about patients suffering from severe sepsis or septic shock: (1) the mean duration of norepinephrine infusion for septic shock patients in an ICU is almost three days; (2) the more crystalloid is required to correct hypoperfusion, the higher the dosage and longer the duration of norepinephrine infusion will be necessary; (3) the longer the patient's INR, the higher the chances of death within 28 days. Since not all patients have their body weight measured on or after admission to the ICU, we suggest further research into indirect estimation of body weight by other means, such as anthropometric measures, to guide the use of drugs and nutritional support in the ICU. In addition, APACHE scores should be included in further studies to compare the severity of the patient's condition in other research. Furthermore, since this study does not cover university hospital ICUs, we suggest that further research concerning such patients should compare and reflect similarities and differences between public and university hospitals in the territory.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 28%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Unspecified 5 6%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 30%
Chemistry 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 18 20%