| Title |
A Data Types Profile Suitable for Use with ISO EN 13606
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Systems, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10916-012-9837-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shanghua Sun, Tony Austin, Dipak Kalra |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 25% |
| Researcher | 7 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 11 | 34% |
| Engineering | 5 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,571,909
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#284
of 1,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,047
of 157,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,162 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.