↓ Skip to main content

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease resolution following sleeve gastrectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease resolution following sleeve gastrectomy
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00464-015-4426-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ardeshir Algooneh, Sulaiman Almazeedi, Salman Al-Sabah, Maha Ahmed, Feras Othman

Abstract

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), a disease highly prevalent among the morbidly obese population, is one of the most common causes of chronic liver disease today. The purpose of this study was to observe the effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on the resolution of NAFLD. A retrospective study was conducted of 84 patients diagnosed with NAFLD prior to undergoing LSG. The diagnosis of NAFLD was achieved based on transabdominal ultrasonographic imaging as per the 2012 joint guidelines for the diagnosis of NAFLD (American Gastroenterological Association, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and American College of Gastroenterology). The patients had follow-up anthropometric measurements and were re-evaluated with postoperative ultrasounds at different time frames to assess the resolution of the disease. The median age of the patients was 44 (17-62), and 66.7 % were female. Average time since surgery was 3.3 years (range 1-5 years). The mean pre- and postoperative BMIs were 46.6 ± 7.8 and 33.0 ± 7.1, respectively, with a mean percent excess weight loss (%EWL) of 55.7 % ± 23.0. A total of 47 (56 %) patients showed complete resolution of NAFLD postoperatively. Multivariate analysis showed a significant resolution of NAFLD in patients achieving >50 % EWL (OR 10.1; p < 0.001) after controlling for age and sex. Weight loss after LSG effectively resolved NAFLD in more than half of the obese patients in this study and can prove to be a useful tool in tackling the disease in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 19 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 23 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2015.
All research outputs
#18,423,683
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#4,756
of 6,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,749
of 264,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#127
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,035 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.