↓ Skip to main content

Preconditioning Shields Against Vascular Events in Surgery (SAVES), a multicentre feasibility trial of preconditioning against adverse events in major vascular surgery: study protocol for a…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
Title
Preconditioning Shields Against Vascular Events in Surgery (SAVES), a multicentre feasibility trial of preconditioning against adverse events in major vascular surgery: study protocol for a randomised control trial
Published in
Trials, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0678-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donagh Healy, Mary Clarke-Moloney, Brendan Gaughan, Siobhan O’Daly, Derek Hausenloy, Faisal Sharif, John Newell, Martin O’Donnell, Pierce Grace, John F Forbes, Walter Cullen, Eamon Kavanagh, Paul Burke, Simon Cross, Joseph Dowdall, Morgan McMonagle, Greg Fulton, Brian J Manning, Elrasheid AH Kheirelseid, Austin Leahy, Daragh Moneley, Peter Naughton, Emily Boyle, Seamus McHugh, Prakash Madhaven, Sean O’Neill, Zenia Martin, Donal Courtney, Muhammed Tubassam, Sherif Sultan, Damian McCartan, Mekki Medani, Stewart Walsh

Abstract

Patients undergoing vascular surgery procedures constitute a 'high-risk' group. Fatal and disabling perioperative complications are common. Complications arise via multiple aetiological pathways. This mechanistic redundancy limits techniques to reduce complications that target individual mechanisms, for example, anti-platelet agents. Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) induces a protective phenotype in at-risk tissue, conferring protection against ischaemia-reperfusion injury regardless of the trigger. RIPC is induced by repeated periods of upper limb ischaemia-reperfusion produced using a blood pressure cuff. RIPC confers some protection against cardiac and renal injury during major vascular surgery in proof-of-concept trials. Similar trials suggest benefit during cardiac surgery. Several uncertainties remain in advance of a full-scale trial to evaluate clinical efficacy. We propose a feasibility trial to fully evaluate arm-induced RIPC's ability to confer protection in major vascular surgery, assess the incidence of a proposed composite primary efficacy endpoint and evaluate the intervention's acceptability to patients and staff. Four hundred major vascular surgery patients in five Irish vascular centres will be randomised (stratified for centre and procedure) to undergo RIPC or not immediately before surgery. RIPC will be induced using a blood pressure cuff with four cycles of 5 minutes of ischaemia followed by 5 minutes of reperfusion immediately before the start of operations. There is no sham intervention. Participants will undergo serum troponin measurements pre-operatively and 1, 2, and 3 days post-operatively. Participants will undergo 12-lead electrocardiograms pre-operatively and on the second post-operative day. Predefined complications within one year of surgery will be recorded. Patient and staff experiences will be explored using qualitative techniques. The primary outcome measure is the proportion of patients who develop elevated serum troponin levels in the first 3 days post-operatively. Secondary outcome measures include length of hospital and critical care stay, unplanned critical care admissions, death, myocardial infarction, stroke, mesenteric ischaemia and need for renal replacement therapy (within 30 days of surgery). RIPC is novel intervention with the potential to significantly improve perioperative outcomes. This trial will provide the first evaluation of RIPC's ability to reduce adverse clinical events following major vascular surgery. www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02097186 Date Registered: 24 March 2014.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 154 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 17%
Student > Master 26 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 45 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 59 38%