↓ Skip to main content

Epicardial adipose tissue in long-term hemodialysis patients: its association with vascular calcification and long-term development

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nephrology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Epicardial adipose tissue in long-term hemodialysis patients: its association with vascular calcification and long-term development
Published in
Journal of Nephrology, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40620-015-0221-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xoana Barros, Timm Dirrichs, Ralf Koos, Sebastian Reinartz, Nadine Kaesler, Rafael Kramann, Ulrich Gladziwa, Markus Ketteler, Jürgen Floege, Nikolaus Marx, José V. Torregrosa, András Keszei, Vincent M. Brandenburg

Abstract

Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) in the general population. EAT is suggested to promote CAD by paracrine mechanisms and local inflammation. We evaluated whether in chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients EAT associates with CAD, how the amount of EAT develops over time, and if EAT independently predicts the mortality risk. Post-hoc analysis of a prospective study in 59 chronic HD patients who underwent non-enhanced multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) at baseline. Thirty-seven patients underwent another MSCT after 24 ± 5 months. We measured EAT volume (cm³) and Agatston calcification scores of coronary arteries (CAC) and aortic valves (AVC). All-cause mortality was assessed after a follow-up of 88 months (IQR 52-105). Baseline EAT was 128.2 ± 60.8 cm³ and significantly higher than in a control group of non-renal patients (94 ± 46 cm³; p < 0.05). Median Agatston score for CAC was 329 (IQR 23-1181) and for AVC was 0 (IQR 0-25.3) in HD patients. We observed significant positive correlations between baseline EAT and age (r = 0.386; p = 0.003), BMI (r = 0.314; p = 0.016), CAC (r = 0.278; p = 0.03), and AVC (r = 0.282; p = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, age, BMI and AVC remained as significant predictors of EAT (p < 0.01). Calcification scores significantly increased over 2 years; in contrast EAT change was not significant (+11 %, IQR -10 to 24 %; p = 0.066). The limited patient number in the present study precludes analysis of the EAT impact upon survival. EAT correlated significantly with cardiovascular calcification in long-term HD patients. Mean EAT did not significantly change over 2 years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 13%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 6 25%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Materials Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2015.
All research outputs
#19,516,978
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nephrology
#755
of 1,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,035
of 267,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nephrology
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.