↓ Skip to main content

Clinical practice: recognizing child sexual abuse—what makes it so difficult?

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
Title
Clinical practice: recognizing child sexual abuse—what makes it so difficult?
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00431-018-3193-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thekla F. Vrolijk-Bosschaart, Sonja N. Brilleslijper-Kater, Marc A. Benninga, Ramón J. L. Lindauer, Arianne H. Teeuw

Abstract

Recognizing child sexual abuse (CSA) in children is difficult, as there can be many hurdles in the assessment of alleged CSA. With this paper, we try to improve the recognition of CSA by discussing: (1) the difficulties regarding this matter and (2) the diagnostic evaluation of alleged CSA, combining both practical clinical recommendations based on recent research. Children are restrained to disclose CSA due to various reasons, such as fears, shame, and linguistic or verbal limitations. Associations between CSA and urogenital or gastrointestinal symptoms, internalizing and externalizing behavioral problems, post-traumatic stress symptoms, and atypical sexual behavior in children have been reported. However, these symptoms are non-specific for CSA. The majority of sexually abused children do not display signs of penetrative trauma at anogenital examination. Diagnosing a STI in a child can indicate CSA. However, other transmission routes (e.g., vertical transmission, auto-inoculation) need to be considered as well. The assessment consists of medical interview and child interview (parents and child separate and together) with special attention to the child's development and behavior (problems), psychosocial situation and physical complaints, the child's mental health, and the child's trauma history; anogenital examination should be done in all cases of alleged CSA. The examination should be documented by photo or video graphically. Recent research suggests that videography may be the preferred method, and testing on STIs. The assessment should be done multidisciplinary by experienced professionals. Health-care professionals who care for children need to know how child protective agencies and law enforcement are organized. In case there are concerns about a child's safety, the appropriate authorities should be alarmed. What is Known: • Sexual abuse in children often remains unrecognized in the majority of cases. What is New: • Research suggests that videographic documentation is preferred above photographic documentation for anogenital examination; observations of children's behavioral reactions during examinations might be valuable in the evaluation of suspected sexual abuse; nucleic acid amplification testing can be used on vaginal swabs or urine samples for chlamydia and gonorrhea; the CRIES-13 and the CAPS-CA can be used to assess trauma-symptoms in children after sexual abuse.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 215 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Student > Master 19 9%
Researcher 11 5%
Unspecified 10 5%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 97 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 13%
Psychology 28 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 9%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Unspecified 10 5%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 100 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,859,417
of 25,545,162 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#191
of 4,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,967
of 342,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#6
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,545,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.