↓ Skip to main content

Wild zebra finches do not use social information from conspecific reproductive success for nest site choice and clutch size decisions

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Wild zebra finches do not use social information from conspecific reproductive success for nest site choice and clutch size decisions
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00265-018-2533-3
Authors

Hanja B. Brandl, Simon C. Griffith, Wiebke Schuett

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Researcher 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 15 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 38%
Environmental Science 5 9%
Psychology 5 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 21 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,642,505
of 24,648,202 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#829
of 3,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,342
of 334,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#20
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,648,202 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.