| Title |
From the Universities to the Marketplace: The Business Ethics Journey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business Ethics, November 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1006019519031 |
| Authors |
David M. O'Connell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 6% |
| China | 1 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 24% |
| Researcher | 2 | 12% |
| Professor | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 24% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 47% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 12% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2015.
All research outputs
#2,201,745
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#397
of 3,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,239
of 41,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them