You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Changes in the electrical properties of the electrode–skin–underlying tissue composite during a week-long programme of neuromuscular electrical stimulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Physiological Measurement, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1088/0967-3334/35/2/231 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S I Bîrlea, P P Breen, G J Corley, N M Bîrlea, F Quondamatteo, G ÓLaighin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 22% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 24 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 7% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2015.
All research outputs
#15,690,772
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from Physiological Measurement
#1,068
of 1,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,120
of 307,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physiological Measurement
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,407 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.