You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Chemically Doped Naphthalenediimide‐Bithiazole Polymer for n‐Type Organic Thermoelectrics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advanced Materials, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/adma.201801898 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suhao Wang, Hengda Sun, Tim Erdmann, Gang Wang, Daniele Fazzi, Uwe Lappan, Yuttapoom Puttisong, Zhihua Chen, Magnus Berggren, Xavier Crispin, Anton Kiriy, Brigitte Voit, Tobin J. Marks, Simone Fabiano, Antonio Facchetti |
| Abstract |
The synthesis of a novel naphthalenediimide (NDI)-bithiazole (Tz2)-based polymer [P(NDI2OD-Tz2)] is reported, and structural, thin-film morphological, as well as charge transport and thermoelectric properties are compared to the parent and widely investigated NDI-bithiophene (T2) polymer [P(NDI2OD-T2)]. Since the steric repulsions in Tz2 are far lower than in T2, P(NDI2OD-Tz2) exhibits a more planar and rigid backbone, enhancing π-π chain stacking and intermolecular interactions. In addition, the electron-deficient nature of Tz2 enhances the polymer electron affinity, thus reducing the polymer donor-acceptor character. When n-doped with amines, P(NDI2OD-Tz2) achieves electrical conductivity (≈0.1 S cm-1 ) and a power factor (1.5 µW m-1 K-2 ) far greater than those of P(NDI2OD-T2) (0.003 S cm-1 and 0.012 µW m-1 K-2 , respectively). These results demonstrate that planarized NDI-based polymers with reduced donor-acceptor character can achieve substantial electrical conductivity and thermoelectric response. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Italy | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 21% |
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 35 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 39 | 28% |
| Materials Science | 26 | 19% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 13 | 9% |
| Chemical Engineering | 9 | 6% |
| Energy | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 41 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2020.
All research outputs
#5,269,979
of 25,305,422 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Materials
#5,121
of 17,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,037
of 335,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Materials
#123
of 285 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,305,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 285 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.