| Title |
Dr. Jack Tu, a research superstar ahead of his time (1965–2018)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.109-5620 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wendy Glauser |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 14 | 82% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 24% |
| Scientists | 4 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,219,034
of 24,340,143 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#3,257
of 9,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,537
of 332,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#71
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,340,143 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.