↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Acute Cardiac Effects of Severe Pre-Eclampsia

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
Acute Cardiac Effects of Severe Pre-Eclampsia
Published in
JACC, July 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.048
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arthur Jason Vaught, Lara C. Kovell, Linda M. Szymanski, Susan A. Mayer, Sara M. Seifert, Dhananjay Vaidya, Jamie D. Murphy, Cynthia Argani, Anna O’Kelly, Sarah York, Pamela Ouyang, Monica Mukherjee, Sammy Zakaria

Abstract

Pre-eclampsia with severe features (PEC) is a pregnancy-specific syndrome characterized by severe hypertension and end-organ dysfunction, and is associated with short-term adverse cardiovascular events, including heart failure, pulmonary edema, and stroke. The authors aimed to characterize the short-term echocardiographic, clinical, and laboratory changes in women with PEC, focusing on right ventricular (RV) systolic pressure (RVSP) and echocardiographic-derived diastolic, systolic, and speckle tracking parameters. In this prospective observational study, the authors recruited 63 women with PEC and 36 pregnant control patients. The PEC cohort had higher RVSP (31.0 ± 7.9 mm Hg vs. 22.5 ± 6.1 mm Hg; p < 0.001) and decreased global RV longitudinal systolic strain (RVLSS) (-19.6 ± 3.2% vs. -23.8 ± 2.9% [p < 0.0001]) when compared with the control cohort. For left-sided cardiac parameters, there were differences (p < 0.001) in mitral septal e' velocity (9.6 ± 2.4 cm/s vs. 11.6 ± 1.9 cm/s), septal E/e' ratio (10.8 ± 2.8 vs. 7.4 ± 1.6), left atrial area size (20.1 ± 3.8 cm2 vs. 17.3 ± 2.9 cm2), and posterior and septal wall thickness (median [interquartile range]: 1.0 cm [0.9 to 1.1 cm] vs. 0.8 cm [0.7 to 0.9 cm], and 1.0 cm [0.8 to 1.2 cm] vs. 0.8 cm [0.7 to 0.9 cm]). Eight women (12.7%) with PEC had grade II diastolic dysfunction, and 6 women (9.5%) had peripartum pulmonary edema. Women with PEC have higher RVSP, higher rates of abnormal diastolic function, decreased global RVLSS, increased left-sided chamber remodeling, and higher rates of peripartum pulmonary edema, when compared with healthy pregnant women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 172 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 160 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Researcher 12 8%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 60 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Unspecified 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 65 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 159. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#262,735
of 25,753,578 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#599
of 16,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,579
of 342,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#17
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.