↓ Skip to main content

Histoplasmosis Infections Worldwide: Thinking Outside of the Ohio River Valley

Overview of attention for article published in Current Tropical Medicine Reports, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 153)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
Title
Histoplasmosis Infections Worldwide: Thinking Outside of the Ohio River Valley
Published in
Current Tropical Medicine Reports, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40475-015-0044-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathan C. Bahr, Spinello Antinori, L. Joseph Wheat, George A. Sarosi

Abstract

In the United States, histoplasmosis is generally thought to occur mainly in the Ohio and Mississippi River Valleys, and the classic map of histoplasmosis distribution reflecting this is second nature to many U.S. physicians. With the advent of the HIV pandemic reports of patients with progressive disseminated histoplasmosis and AIDS came from regions of known endemicity, as well as from regions not thought to be endemic for histoplasmosis throughout the world. In addition, our expanding armamentarium of immunosuppressive medications and biologics has increased the diagnosis of histoplasmosis worldwide. While our knowledge of areas in which histoplasmosis is endemic has improved, it is still incomplete. Our contention is that physicians should consider histoplasmosis with the right constellations of symptoms in any febrile patient with immune suppression, regardless of geographic location or travel history.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 141 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Student > Master 12 8%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 46 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 51 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,437,280
of 25,292,646 outputs
Outputs from Current Tropical Medicine Reports
#12
of 153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,966
of 271,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Tropical Medicine Reports
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.