↓ Skip to main content

Who’s funny: Gender stereotypes, humor production, and memory bias

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
36 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Who’s funny: Gender stereotypes, humor production, and memory bias
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, October 2011
DOI 10.3758/s13423-011-0161-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Mickes, Drew E. Walker, Julian L. Parris, Robert Mankoff, Nicholas J. S. Christenfeld

Abstract

It has often been asserted, by both men and women, that men are funnier. We explored two possible explanations for such a view, first testing whether men, when instructed to be as funny as possible, write funnier cartoon captions than do women, and second examining whether there is a tendency to falsely remember funny things as having been produced by men. A total of 32 participants, half from each gender, wrote captions for 20 cartoons. Raters then indicated the humor success of these captions. Raters of both genders found the captions written by males funnier, though this preference was significantly stronger among the male raters. In the second experiment, male and female participants were presented with the funniest and least funny captions from the first experiment, along with the caption author's gender. On a memory test, both females and males disproportionately misattributed the humorous captions to males and the nonhumorous captions to females. Men might think men are funnier because they actually find them so, but though women rated the captions written by males slightly higher, our data suggest that they may regard men as funnier more because they falsely attribute funny things to them.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Switzerland 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 102 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 23%
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Student > Master 15 14%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 17 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 53 49%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Arts and Humanities 9 8%
Linguistics 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 22 20%