↓ Skip to main content

Melatonin rescued interleukin 1β-impaired chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Melatonin rescued interleukin 1β-impaired chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells
Published in
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13287-018-0892-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bo Gao, Wenjie Gao, Zizhao Wu, Taifeng Zhou, Xianjian Qiu, Xudong Wang, Chengjie Lian, Yan Peng, Anjing Liang, Jincheng Qiu, Yuanxin Zhu, Caixia Xu, Yibing Li, Peiqiang Su, Dongsheng Huang

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a widespread arthritic disease and a primary cause of disability. Increasing evidence suggests that inflammation has a pivotal part in its pathogenesis. Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) is a primary mediator of local inflammatory processes in OA. Current therapies for OA mainly focus on the symptoms of the advanced stage of the disease. The possible utilization of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) to regenerate cartilage is an appealing method, but in the case of OA requires chondrogenesis to take place within an inflamed environment. Our previous study showed that melatonin (MLT) can promote chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs, but whether MLT can rescue IL-1β-impaired chondrogenesis in human BMSCs has not yet been established. MLT, which can have anti-inflammatory and prochondrogenic effects, has demonstrated potential in defeating IL-1β-induced inhibition of chondrogenesis and further study should be conducted. Human bone marrow-derived MSCs were separated and cultured based on our system that was already documented. A high-density micromass culture system was used for the chondrogenic differentiation of human BMSCs, which was also described previously. Human BMSCs were induced for chondrogenesis for 7, 14, and 21 days with the treatment of IL-1β and MLT. The cultured cartilage pellets were then evaluated by morphology, extracellular matrix accumulation, and chondrogenic, metabolic, and apoptotic marker expression. Furthermore, cell apoptosis was assessed by TUNEL assay. The phosphorylation level P65 and IκBα of the NF-κB pathway activity was explored on day 21 of chondrogenic differentiation of BMSCs. The current evaluation showed that MLT can save IL-1β-impaired chondrogenesis of human BMSCs in different aspects. Firstly, MLT can restore the chondrogenic pellet size, and rescue matrix synthesis and accumulation. Secondly, MLT can upregulate chondrogenic marker COL2A1 expression at both mRNA and protein levels, and also regulate the expression levels of other chondrogenic markers like ACAN, SOX9, and COL10A1 in the presence of IL-1β. Thirdly, MLT can maintain the metabolic balance of the chondrogenic process by suppressing expression of catabolic genes, such as MMP, MMP13, and ADAMTS4. Furthermore, MLT can subdue IL-1β-induced cell apoptosis of BMSCs throughout chondrogenesis. Meanwhile, MLT suppressed the phosphorylation level of P65 and IκBα, which were elevated by IL-1β treatment, indicating that MLT can attenuate the IL-1β-induced activation of NF-κB signaling. The current evaluation showed that MLT can save IL-1β-impaired chondrogenesis of human BMSCs by restoring the pellet size and matrix accumulation, and maintaining the metabolic balance, reducing cell apoptosis. Our study also showed that MLT can attenuate the IL-1β-induced activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway, which is the most important pathway downstream of IL-1β, and plays a crucial role in inflammation, apoptosis, and metabolism. Thus, MLT has prospects for treating OA due to its multifaceted functions, such as mitigating inflammation, maintaining metabolic balance, and mitigating apoptosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 25%
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Librarian 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 8 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Engineering 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 9%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 11 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2018.
All research outputs
#18,640,437
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#1,750
of 2,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,732
of 328,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#51
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.