↓ Skip to main content

Overview of 15-year severe combined immunodeficiency in the Netherlands: towards newborn blood spot screening

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Overview of 15-year severe combined immunodeficiency in the Netherlands: towards newborn blood spot screening
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00431-015-2518-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne P. J. de Pagter, Robbert G. M. Bredius, Taco W. Kuijpers, Jelco Tramper, Mirjam van der Burg, Joris van Montfrans, Gertjan J. Driessen, on behalf of the Dutch Working Party for Immunodeficiencies

Abstract

Severe combined immune deficiency (SCID) is a fatal primary immunodeficiency usually presenting in the first months of life with (opportunistic) infections, diarrhea, and failure to thrive. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and gene therapy (GT) are curative treatment options. The objective of the study was to assess the morbidity, mortality, and diagnostic and therapeutic delay in children with SCID in the Netherlands in the last 15 years. These data may help to judge whether SCID should be considered to be included in our national neonatal screening program. In the period 1998-2013, 43 SCID patients were diagnosed in the Netherlands, 11 of whom were atypical SCID (presentation beyond the first year). The median interval between the first symptom and diagnosis was 2 months (range 0-1173 months). The total mortality was 42 %. In total, 32 patients were treated with HSCT of whom 8 were deceased. Nine patients died due to severe infectious complications before curative treatment could be initiated. Because of a high mortality of patients with SCID before HSCT could be initiated, only a national newborn screening program and pre-emptive HSCT or GT will be able to improve survival of these patients. "What is known" • SCID is a fatal disease if a curative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation cannot be performed in time. • Newborn screening for SCID enables early diagnosis in the asymptomatic phase. "What is new" • Nine out of 43 SCID patients in the Netherlands died due to severe infectious complications before curative treatment could be initiated. • Only newborn screening and pre-emptive curative therapy will improve survival of children with SCID in the Netherlands.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 10 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2015.
All research outputs
#18,423,683
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#3,115
of 3,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,571
of 264,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#38
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.