You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Taking the Operant Paradigm into the Field: Associative Learning in Wild Great Tits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0133821 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie Morand-Ferron, Steven Hamblin, Ella F. Cole, Lucy M. Aplin, John L. Quinn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 23% |
| Canada | 3 | 7% |
| United States | 3 | 7% |
| Brazil | 2 | 5% |
| Japan | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 73% |
| Scientists | 9 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 29% |
| Researcher | 28 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 76 | 51% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 8% |
| Psychology | 12 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 34 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,533,727
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#18,955
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,678
of 281,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#496
of 6,182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.