↓ Skip to main content

MicroRNA-218 regulates cisplatin (DPP) chemosensitivity in non-small cell lung cancer by targeting RUNX2

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
MicroRNA-218 regulates cisplatin (DPP) chemosensitivity in non-small cell lung cancer by targeting RUNX2
Published in
Tumor Biology, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13277-015-3831-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Xie, Fei Yu, Dan Li, Xuchao Zhu, Xiaoping Zhang, Zhongwei Lv

Abstract

Downregulation of microRNA-218 (miR-218) is found in various human cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the involvement of chemosensitivity to cisplatin (DDP) and the underlying molecular mechanism remain unclear. In this study, we investigate whether miR-218 mediates NSCLC cell functions associated with chemoresistance. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was utilized to detect miR-218 expression in NSCLC cell lines A549/DDP and/or A549. The cell activity was measured by MTT assay. Cell cycle and cell apoptosis were detected by flow cytometry. Luciferase reporter assays and Western blots were used to validate runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) as a direct target gene of miR-218. miR-218 was significantly reduced in A549/DDP cells compared with parent A549 cells. Upregulation of miR-218 altered cell cycle-induced cell apoptosis and enhanced the sensitivity of A549/DDP cells to cisplatin. Mechanistically, RUNX2 was identified as a direct and functional target of miR-218, and RUNX2 executed the former on lung cancer chemoresistance. Our present study demonstrated for the first time that downregulation of miR-218 may contribute to the chemoresistance of NSCLC cells to cisplatin, which leads to upregulation of RUNX2. Uncovering the mechanism represents a novel approach to enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy during cancer treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Unspecified 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2015.
All research outputs
#20,288,585
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,834
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,229
of 266,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#127
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.