You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Have research assessment exercises improved the quality of nursing research?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Advanced Nursing, August 2015
|
DOI | 10.1111/jan.12751 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alexander M. Clark, David R. Thompson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 11 | 19% |
Spain | 8 | 14% |
Canada | 6 | 10% |
United States | 4 | 7% |
Italy | 3 | 5% |
Australia | 3 | 5% |
Ireland | 2 | 3% |
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
Tunisia | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 16 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 26 | 44% |
Scientists | 16 | 27% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 22% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
Professor | 1 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 18% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 9% |
Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Computer Science | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,176,638
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#433
of 5,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,147
of 278,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#12
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.