↓ Skip to main content

Learning from mistakes in climate research

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Climatology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 1,929)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
50 news outlets
blogs
28 blogs
twitter
3147 X users
facebook
30 Facebook pages
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
8 Google+ users
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
358 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Learning from mistakes in climate research
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Climatology, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00704-015-1597-5
Authors

Rasmus E. Benestad, Dana Nuccitelli, Stephan Lewandowsky, Katharine Hayhoe, Hans Olav Hygen, Rob van Dorland, John Cook

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,147 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Norway 4 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 342 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 80 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 20%
Student > Master 48 13%
Professor 25 7%
Student > Bachelor 21 6%
Other 67 19%
Unknown 47 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 56 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 48 13%
Social Sciences 19 5%
Engineering 19 5%
Other 100 28%
Unknown 61 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2052. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,485
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Climatology
#1
of 1,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17
of 278,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Climatology
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.