| Title |
An improved cyclonic wind distribution for computation of storm surges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-018-3193-3 |
| Authors |
Smita Pandey, A. D. Rao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
| Researcher | 2 | 18% |
| Professor | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2018.
All research outputs
#5,829,518
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#691
of 1,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,491
of 333,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#30
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.