↓ Skip to main content

Adverse drug reactions experience in a teaching hospital in Jordan

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Adverse drug reactions experience in a teaching hospital in Jordan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11096-015-0185-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammed Alsbou, Sameh Alzubiedi, Hamed Alzobi, Nawal Abu Samhadanah, Yousef Alsaraireh, Omar Alrawashdeh, Amin Aqel, Khalil Al-Salem

Abstract

Background Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent a major health care problem. Objective To identify the most common ADRs, drugs implicated in ADRs, and to assess their causality, severity, preventability and risk factors predisposing to reported ADRs in Jordan. Setting Al-Karak teaching hospital, southern of Jordan. Method A cross sectional observational study was carried out for 11 months from January to November 2013. Suspected ADRs were recorded in ADRs report forms and analyzed for causality, severity, and preventability. Most common ADRs, drugs involved in these ADRs, causality, severity, and preventability of suspected ADRs. Results A total of 64 reports were received. Some patients suffered more than one ADR. The total number of ADRs identified was 108. Forty one drugs were involved in causing these ADRs. About 2/3 of adverse reactions (73.4 %) did not cause admission to the hospital, whereas 26.6 % of the ADRs resulted in admission. Majority of the ADRs were type A (62.5 %). Most of ADRs (92.2 %) were assessed as probable. Nearly, 65.6 % of ADRs were categorized as mild. Majority of ADRs were assessed as "not preventable" (75 %). The most common classes of drugs involved in ADRs were antibiotics, analgesics, vaccines and antiepileptics. The most commonly identified ADRs were abdominal pain, skin rash, shortness of breath, fever, upper gastrointestinal bleeding and vomiting. Risk factors contributed to ADRs were age and polypharmacy. Conclusion Jordanian healthcare providers should be aware of the importance of detecting and reporting ADRs, in order to prevent and reduce the incidence of ADRs. Awareness of risk factors predisposing to ADRs may help in identifying patients with higher risk and therefore reducing the risk of these ADRs and improving patient outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 14 24%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 19 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2015.
All research outputs
#18,423,683
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#875
of 1,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,843
of 266,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.