↓ Skip to main content

Transcriptional regulation of Annexin A2 promotes starvation-induced autophagy

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcriptional regulation of Annexin A2 promotes starvation-induced autophagy
Published in
Nature Communications, August 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms9045
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin Moreau, Ghita Ghislat, Warren Hochfeld, Maurizio Renna, Eszter Zavodszky, Gautam Runwal, Claudia Puri, Shirley Lee, Farah Siddiqi, Fiona M. Menzies, Brinda Ravikumar, David C. Rubinsztein

Abstract

Autophagy is an important degradation pathway, which is induced after starvation, where it buffers nutrient deprivation by recycling macromolecules in organisms from yeast to man. While the classical pathway mediating this response is via mTOR inhibition, there are likely to be additional pathways that support the process. Here, we identify Annexin A2 as an autophagy modulator that regulates autophagosome formation by enabling appropriate ATG9A trafficking from endosomes to autophagosomes via actin. This process is dependent on the Annexin A2 effectors ARP2 and Spire1. Annexin A2 expression increases after starvation in cells in an mTOR-independent fashion. This is mediated via Jun N-terminal kinase activation of c-Jun, which, in turn, enhances the trans-activation of the Annexin A2 promoter. Annexin A2 knockdown abrogates starvation-induced autophagy, while its overexpression induces autophagy. Hence, c-Jun-mediated transcriptional responses support starvation-induced autophagy by regulating Annexin A2 expression levels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 21%
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Neuroscience 7 8%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 16 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2015.
All research outputs
#13,507,549
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#39,573
of 48,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,512
of 266,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#582
of 770 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 770 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.