↓ Skip to main content

A Re-conceptualization of Access for 21st Century Healthcare

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
242 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
429 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A Re-conceptualization of Access for 21st Century Healthcare
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11606-011-1806-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

John C. Fortney, James F. Burgess, Hayden B. Bosworth, Brenda M. Booth, Peter J. Kaboli

Abstract

Many e-health technologies are available to promote virtual patient-provider communication outside the context of face-to-face clinical encounters. Current digital communication modalities include cell phones, smartphones, interactive voice response, text messages, e-mails, clinic-based interactive video, home-based web-cams, mobile smartphone two-way cameras, personal monitoring devices, kiosks, dashboards, personal health records, web-based portals, social networking sites, secure chat rooms, and on-line forums. Improvements in digital access could drastically diminish the geographical, temporal, and cultural access problems faced by many patients. Conversely, a growing digital divide could create greater access disparities for some populations. As the paradigm of healthcare delivery evolves towards greater reliance on non-encounter-based digital communications between patients and their care teams, it is critical that our theoretical conceptualization of access undergoes a concurrent paradigm shift to make it more relevant for the digital age. The traditional conceptualizations and indicators of access are not well adapted to measure access to health services that are delivered digitally outside the context of face-to-face encounters with providers. This paper provides an overview of digital "encounterless" utilization, discusses the weaknesses of traditional conceptual frameworks of access, presents a new access framework, provides recommendations for how to measure access in the new framework, and discusses future directions for research on access.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 429 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 420 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 73 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 15%
Researcher 53 12%
Student > Bachelor 38 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 6%
Other 75 17%
Unknown 100 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 21%
Social Sciences 62 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 9%
Psychology 36 8%
Computer Science 23 5%
Other 66 15%
Unknown 111 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,265,320
of 25,382,035 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,313
of 8,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,119
of 146,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#12
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.