↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Intermittent and Incremental Cyclic Stretch on ERK Signaling and Collagen Production in Engineered Tissue

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Effects of Intermittent and Incremental Cyclic Stretch on ERK Signaling and Collagen Production in Engineered Tissue
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12195-015-0415-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jillian B. Schmidt, Kelley Chen, Robert T. Tranquillo

Abstract

Intermittent cyclic stretching and incrementally increasing strain amplitude cyclic stretching were explored to overcome the reported adaptation of fibroblasts in response to constant amplitude cyclic stretching, with the goals of accelerating collagen production and understanding the underlying cell signaling. The effects of constant amplitude, intermittent, and incremental cyclic stretching regimens were investigated for dermal fibroblasts entrapped in a fibrin gel by monitoring the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2) and p38 pathways, collagen transcription, and finally the deposited collagen protein. Activation of ERK1/2, which has been shown to be necessary for stretch-induced collagen transcription, was maximal at 15 min and decayed by 1 h. ERK1/2 was reactivated by an additional onset of stretching or by an increment in the strain amplitude 6 h after the initial stimulus, which was approximately the lifetime of activated p38, a known ERK1/2 inhibitor. While both intermittent and incremental regimens reactivated ERK1/2, only incremental stretching increased collagen production compared to samples stretched with constant amplitude, resulting in a 37% increase in collagen per cell after 2 weeks. This suggests that a regimen with small, frequent increments in strain amplitude is optimal for this system and should be used in bioreactors for engineered tissues requiring high collagen content.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 28%
Student > Master 11 21%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 4 8%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 25 47%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2023.
All research outputs
#16,991,026
of 24,975,223 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
#331
of 499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,190
of 270,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,975,223 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 499 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.