↓ Skip to main content

Musculoskeletal Medicine Is Underrepresented in the American Medical School Clinical Curriculum

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Musculoskeletal Medicine Is Underrepresented in the American Medical School Clinical Curriculum
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11999-015-4511-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benedict F. DiGiovanni, Leigh T. Sundem, Richard D. Southgate, David R. Lambert

Abstract

Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions are common, and their burden on the healthcare system is increasing as the general population ages. It is essential that medical students be well prepared to evaluate and treat MSK disorders in a confident manner as they enter the workforce. Recent studies and the American Association of Medical Colleges have raised concern that medical schools may not give sufficient instruction on this topic. Other authors have shown that preclinical instruction has increased over the past decade; however, it is unclear if required clinical instruction also has followed that trend. The purposes of this study were: (1) to assess the presence and duration of required or selective instruction in a MSK medicine specialty within the clinical years of undergraduate medical education; and (2) to assess the current state of requirements of clinical clerkships or rotations in other surgical and nonsurgical fields for comparison with the initial findings. The web sites of all 141 US medical schools were assessed to determine the content of their clinical curricula for the 2014-2015 academic year; five were excluded because they had not yet had a graduating class by the conclusion of the 2014-2015 academic year. Complete information on required rotations was obtained through the schools' web sites for all 136 (100%) medical schools. For selective experience during the surgery clerkships, complete information was available for 130 of the remaining 136 (96%) web sites. Mean (in weeks, ± SD) duration of core clerkships were as follows: internal medicine (10 ± 2), surgery (8 ± 2), pediatrics (7 ± 1), obstetrics/gynecology (6 ± 1), and psychiatry (5 ± 1). Other common required clerkships were: family medicine (required in 96% [131 of 136] of schools, mean duration of 6 ± 2 weeks), neurology (81% [110], 4 ± 1), and emergency medicine (55% [75], 3 ± 1). Required MSK instruction, at a mean of 2 ± 1 weeks, was only present in 15% (20 of 136) of medical schools. In addition, clinical MSK instruction was offered as a selective (eg, students pick from a selection of subspecialties such as orthopaedics, plastics, or urology during a general surgery clerkship) in 34% (44 of 130) of all medical schools. This is less than other non-core specialties: geriatrics/ambulatory care (required in 40% [54 of 136] of schools, mean duration of 3 ± 1 weeks), critical care (30% [41], mean of 3 ± 1 weeks), radiology (26% [35], mean of 3 ± 1 weeks), anesthesiology (23% [31], mean of 2 ± 1 weeks), and other surgical subspecialties (19% [26], mean of 3 ± 1weeks). Traditional core clerkships continue to be well represented in the clinical years, whereas three newer specialties have gained a larger presence: family medicine, neurology, and emergency medicine; these comprise the "big eight" of clinical clerkships. Given the high prevalence and burden of MSK disorders, required experience in MSK medicine continues to be underrepresented. Further discussion at a national level is needed to determine appropriate representation of MSK medicine specialties during the clinical years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 81 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 9%
Other 6 7%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 25 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 28 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,811,935
of 25,722,279 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#477
of 7,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,244
of 278,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#9
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,722,279 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.