↓ Skip to main content

Myeloid Cells and Related Chronic Inflammatory Factors as Novel Predictive Markers in Melanoma Treatment with Ipilimumab

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Myeloid Cells and Related Chronic Inflammatory Factors as Novel Predictive Markers in Melanoma Treatment with Ipilimumab
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, December 2015
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-0676
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Immunotherapy with ipilimumab improves the survival of patients with metastatic melanoma. Since only around 20% of patients experience long-term benefit, reliable markers are needed to predict a clinical response. Therefore, we sought to determine if some myeloid cells and related inflammatory mediators could serve as predictive factors for the patients' response to ipilimumab. We performed an analysis of myeloid cells in the peripheral blood of 59 stage IV melanoma patients before the treatment and at different time points upon the therapy using a clinical laboratory analysis and multi-color flow cytometry. In addition, the production of related inflammatory factors was evaluated by ELISA or bio-plex assays. An early increase in eosinophil count during the treatment with ipilimumab was associated with an improved clinical response. In contrast, elevated amounts of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (moMDSCs), neutrophils, and monocytes were found in non-responders (n=36) as compared to basal levels and to responding patients (n=23). Moreover, in non-responders, moMDSCs produced significantly more nitric oxide and granulocytic MDSCs expressed higher levels of PD-L1 than these parameters at baseline and in responders suggesting their enhanced immunosuppressive capacity. Upon the first ipilimumab infusion, non-responders displayed elevated serum concentrations of S100A8/A9 and HMGB1 that attract and activate MDSCs. These findings highlight additional mechanisms of ipilimumab effects and suggest levels of eosinophils, MDSCs, as well as related inflammatory factors S100A8/A9 and HMGB1 as novel complex predictive markers for patients who may benefit from the ipilimumab therapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 221 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 15%
Student > Master 25 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Other 17 8%
Other 40 18%
Unknown 49 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 28 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 57 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2023.
All research outputs
#11,884,417
of 34,350,842 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#11,355
of 17,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,910
of 445,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#92
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,350,842 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.